This document describes the process and week-per-week steps related to preparing the release. It should be adapted to take team holidays and other commitments into account, and turned into a clear action plan for the release cycle.
Process any late or blocked release requests for deliverables for any branch (treating the new series branch as stable).
Prepare for the next release cycle by adding deliverable files under the next cycle’s directory. Remove any deliverable files from the current cycle that ended up not having any releases. Then run the following command to use the current cycle deliverables to generate placeholders for the next cycle:
tox -e venv -- init-series $SERIES $NEXT_SERIES
Submit your changes by using the gerrit topic $series-init-series
.
Warning
At this point, the trailing deliverables of the previous series are not necessarily released yet. Adding them here is not an issue, however, we should be vigilant and ensure to create new releases for the previous series first.
Coordinate with the Infrastructure team to swap out the previous cycle signing key and establish the new one for the starting cycle.
Create the $series-relmgt-tracking etherpad using the
make-tracking-etherpad
command.
For example:
tox -e venv -- make-tracking-pad ussuri
The output from this command can be pasted into a
$SERIES-relmgt-tracking
etherpad. Set title formatting for the top
sections. Then highlight all listed weeks and set to Heading 3 style.
Fill in the contents of one of the weeks with the typical items, then copy
and past that into each subsequent week to prepare for the rest of the
cycle.
Email PTLs directly one time to explain the use of the “[release][ptl]”
email tag on the openstack-discuss list and tell them to pay attention
to [release] countdown emails. Use the following email template and
send it with $SERIES Cycle Information
as email subject:
This email is going out to all PTLs and release liaisons for $SERIES.
Welcome to the $SERIES series. On behalf of the release management team, I
just wanted to say hello and make sure you had the information you need
to know what to do and what to expect during this coming release cycle.
Release Schedule
================
If you haven't seen it yet, please take a look at the published schedule for
this cycle:
https://releases.openstack.org/$SERIES/schedule.html
That lists all of the major milestones along the way as we work towards the
coordinated release on $release-date.
Community-wide deadlines are listed under the "Cross-project events" column.
You may notice some projects have added project-specific deadlines under the
"Project-specific events" column. That can be done by submitting a patch to the
openstack/releases repo updating the doc/source/$SERIES/schedule.* files, if
you would like to make sure those deadlines are published somewhere.
Countdown Emails
================
Throughout the cycle, we will be sending regular "countdown" emails to the
openstack-discuss mailing list. If you have filtering set up for mailing list
emails, please make sure you are not filtering out subject lines that contain
"[release]" and "[ptl]" tags.
These countdown emails will contain important updates on upcoming deadlines and
information about necessary actions throughout the cycle. We try to keep them
to a minimum, so earlier on in the cycle they will not be sent weekly, but
around deadline times and especially towards the end of the cycle, these will
go out weekly to make sure everyone has the information they need to get work
done in time. Your attention to these emails would be appreciated. We will try
to keep them short.
Deliverables
============
The release process may be new for a few of you. All official OpenStack
deliverables are released by updating deliverable files in the
openstack/releases repo:
https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/$SERIES
Please take a look at your deliverable files and make sure the release-model
matches what the team plans to follow for this cycle. This model is a way to
communicate to downstream consumers what to expect, so the release team uses
your declared model to determine when and how to enforce different steps during
the cycle.
Details on the release models and what they mean, as well as documentation on
how to use the releases repo, can be found in the references section here:
https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#references
That has documentation for some of our tooling too. The most important one you
may want to know about is the new-release tooling so you don't need to edit
those yaml files directly. That command can be used like this:
tools/new_release.sh $SERIES cinder feature
The last part can be major (major version bump), feature (minor version bump),
and bugfix (bugfix, or the Z in X.Y.Z).
Reviews
=======
Because of the strict timing of the cycle schedule, it is important that you
review release patches within some days or usually until Thursdays EOB if
possible. Please look at the incoming review request emails (sent by gerrit)
from openstack/releases repository regularly or at least check your inbox at
least once or twice a week:
https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+reviewer:self+is:open
The above link shows a customised list of release patches that only contains
patches that you are added as reviewer. Release managers use a script to add
PTLs and release liaisons to their relevant release patches as reviewers.
Release Liaisons
================
If anyone should be added as a release liaison, or removed, just submit a patch
to update the data/release_liaisons.yaml file in the openstack/releases repo
with current information for your team.
Please contact us at any point with any questions. We can be reached on the
openstack-discuss mailing list with the [release] tag, or on IRC in the
#openstack-release channel.
Thanks for your attention. I hope the $SERIES cycle goes well for everyone.
At the end of the week, send the following weekly email content:
Welcome back to the release countdown emails! These will be sent at
major points in the $SERIES development cycle, which should conclude
with a final release on $release-date.
Development Focus
-----------------
At this stage in the release cycle, focus should be on planning the
$SERIES development cycle, assessing $SERIES community goals and approving
$SERIES specs.
General Information
-------------------
$remark-on-series-length. In case you haven't seen it yet, please take
a look over the schedule for this release:
https://releases.openstack.org/$SERIES/schedule.html
By default, the team PTL is responsible for handling the release cycle
and approving release requests. This task can (and probably should) be
delegated to release liaisons. Now is a good time to review release
liaison information for your team and make sure it is up to date:
https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/data/release_liaisons.yaml
By default, all your team deliverables from the $PREVIOUS_SERIES release are
continued in $SERIES with a similar release model.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$other-upcoming-event_
$SERIES-1 milestone: $milestone1
Review cycle-trailing projects to check which haven’t released yet. Ask them to prepare their releases, if they haven’t already. The list of pending cycle-trailing deliverables can be determined by running the command:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --series $LASTSERIES \
--type trailing --missing-final
At the end of the week, send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
The $SERIES-1 milestone is next week, on $milestone1! Project team plans
for the $SERIES cycle should now be solidified.
General Information
-------------------
Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next
week, the release team will propose releases for any library which had
changes but has not been otherwise released since the $LASTSERIES release.
PTL's or release liaisons, please watch for these and give a +1 to
acknowledge them. If there is some reason to hold off on a release, let
us know that as well, by posting a -1. If we do not hear anything at all
by the end of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed.
NB: If one of your libraries is still releasing 0.x versions, start
thinking about when it will be appropriate to do a 1.0 version. The
version number does signal the state, real or perceived, of the library,
so we strongly encourage going to a full major version once things are
in a good and usable state.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$SERIES-1 milestone: $milestone1
Ensure that all trailing projects have been branched for the previous series.
List unbranched projects using:
tools/list_unbranched_projects.sh
Propose a patch to branch the missing ones.
Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary libraries which did not release since the previous release.
List them using:
tox -e venv -- \
list-deliverables \
--unreleased \
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type client-library \
--type library \
> /tmp/deliverables.log
Edit the generated file (/tmp/deliverables.log
) to remove tox’s logs.
Generate release requests for all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which had changes, but did not release since the previous release.
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-milestone-1
as topic.
For this, run (c.f tools/process_auto_releases.sh):
tools/process_auto_releases.sh $SERIES $(cat /tmp/deliverables.log)
That patch will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the library, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
Here is an example of milestone 1 generated for Wallaby:
Between Tuesday and Thursday, merge as soon as possible the patches that get +1 from the PTL or the release liaison.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
To catch if there are acl issues in newly created repositories, run tools/aclissues.py to detect potential leftovers in Gerrit ACLs allowing official deliverables to be directly tagged or branched without going through openstack/releases. You need to specify the location of up-to-date checkouts for the governance and the project-config repositories. For example:
tools/aclissues.py ../project-config ../governance
If the tool reports any violation, you can re-run it with --patch
to
generate needed changes in ../project-config to align ACLs with governance,
and propose the changes for review.
At the end of the week, send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
We are now past the $SERIES-1 milestone. Teams should now be focused on
feature development and completion of goals [0].
[0] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/index.html
General Information
-------------------
Our next milestone in this development cycle will be $SERIES-2, on
$milestone2. This milestone is when we freeze the list of deliverables
that will be included in the $SERIES final release, so if you plan to
introduce new deliverables in this release, please propose a change to
add an empty deliverable file in the deliverables/$SERIES directory of
the openstack/releases repository.
Now is also generally a good time to look at bugfixes that were
introduced in the master branch that might make sense to be backported
and released in a stable release.
If you have any question around the OpenStack release process, feel free
to ask on this mailing-list or on the #openstack-release channel on IRC.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$SERIES-2 Milestone: $milestone2
Review any remaining milestone-1 exceptions
Send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
The $SERIES-2 milestone will happen in next month, on $milestone2.
$SERIES-related specs should now be finalized so that teams can move
to implementation ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on
the second milestone (mostly spec freezes): please refer to
https://releases.openstack.org/$SERIES/schedule.html for details.
General Information
-------------------
Please remember that libraries need to be released at least once per
milestone period. At milestone 2, the release team will propose releases
for any library that has not been otherwise released since milestone 1.
Other non-library deliverables that follow the cycle-with-intermediary
release model should have an intermediary release before milestone-2.
Those who haven't will be proposed to switch to the cycle-with-rc model,
which is more suited to deliverables that are released only once per cycle.
At milestone-2 we also freeze the contents of the final release. If you
have a new deliverable that should be included in the final release, you
should make sure it has a deliverable file in:
https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/$series
You should request a beta release (or intermediary release) for those new
deliverables by milestone-2. We understand some may not be quite ready
for a full release yet, but if you have something minimally viable to
get released it would be good to do a 0.x release to exercise the release
tooling for your deliverables. See the MembershipFreeze description for
more details: https://releases.openstack.org/$SERIES/schedule.html#$S-mf
Finally, now may be a good time for teams to check on any stable
releases that need to be done for your deliverables. If you have
bugfixes that have been backported, but no stable release getting
those. If you are unsure what is out there committed but not released,
in the openstack/releases repo, running the command
"tools/list_stable_unreleased_changes.sh <cycle_name>" gives a nice report.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$SERIES-2 Milestone: $milestone2
Ahead of MembershipFreeze, run governance_consistency.py
:
python3 tools/governance_consistency.py $series $project_yaml_file
This tool will list all inconsistencies between the deliverables described in the governance’s reference “projects.yaml” file and the deliverables defined in the $series directory or the _independent directory. There should ideally be none.
For deliverables defined in governance but not in deliverable files,
they should either be tagged as a release management exception if they do
not need to be released (see release-management
key in the governance
projects.yaml file) or an empty deliverable file should be added to the
series so that we can properly track it. Leftovers are considered too young
to be released in the next release and will be reconsidered at the next
cycle.
For deliverables defined in deliverable files but not in (active) governance, their deliverable file should generally be removed from the $series directory, or marked release-model:abandoned if present in the _independent directory.
Send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
The $SERIES-2 milestone is next week, on $milestone2! $SERIES-related
specs should now be finalized so that teams can move to implementation
ASAP. Some teams observe specific deadlines on the second milestone
(mostly spec freezes): please refer to
https://releases.openstack.org/$SERIES/schedule.html for details.
General Information
-------------------
Libraries need to be released at least once per milestone period. Next
week, the release team will propose releases for any library that has not
been otherwise released since milestone 1. PTL's and release liaisons,
please watch for these and give a +1 to acknowledge them. If there is
some reason to hold off on a release, let us know that as well. A +1
would be appreciated, but if we do not hear anything at all by the end
of the week, we will assume things are OK to proceed.
Remember that non-library deliverables that follow the
cycle-with-intermediary release model should have an intermediary
release before milestone-2. Those who haven't will be proposed to switch
to the cycle-with-rc model, which is more suited to deliverables that
are released only once per cycle.
Next week is also the deadline to freeze the contents of the final
release. All new '$SERIES' deliverables need to have a deliverable file
in https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables
and need to have done a release by milestone-2.
Changes proposing those deliverables for inclusion in $SERIES have been
posted, please update them with an actual release request before the
milestone-2 deadline if you plan on including that deliverable in $SERIES,
or -1 if you need one more cycle to be ready.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$SERIES-2 Milestone: $milestone2
Generate a list of all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which did not release since the YYYY-MM-DD date of milestone-1. For this, run:
tox -e venv -- \
list-deliverables \
--unreleased-since YYYY-MM-DD \
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type client-library \
--type library \
> /tmp/deliverables.log
Then, edit the generated file to remove tox’s logs.
Generate release requests for all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which had changes, but did not release since milestone-1.
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-milestone-2
as topic.
For this, run (c.f tools/process_auto_releases.sh):
tools/process_auto_releases.sh $SERIES $(cat /tmp/deliverables.log)
That patch will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the library, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
Here is an example of milestone 2 generated for Wallaby:
To catch if there are acl issues in newly created repositories,
run tools/aclissues.py
to detect potential leftovers in Gerrit ACLs
allowing official deliverables to be directly tagged or branched without
going through openstack/releases. You need to specify the location
of up-to-date checkouts for the governance and the project-config
repositories. For example:
tools/aclissues.py ../project-config ../governance
If the tool reports any violation, you can re-run it with --patch
to
generate needed changes in ../project-config to align ACLs with governance,
and propose the changes for review.
Send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
We are now past the $SERIES-2 milestone, and entering the last development
phase of the cycle. Teams should be focused on implementing planned work
for the cycle.
Now is a good time to review those plans and reprioritize anything if
needed based on the what progress has been made and what looks realistic
to complete in the next few weeks.
General Information
-------------------
Looking ahead to the end of the release cycle, please be aware of the
feature freeze dates. Those vary depending on deliverable type:
* General libraries (except client libraries) need to have their last
feature release before Non-client library freeze ($nclfreeze). Their
stable branches are cut early.
* Client libraries (think python-*client libraries) need to have their
last feature release before Client library freeze ($milestone3)
* Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most
services) observe a Feature freeze on that same date, $milestone3.
Any feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the
mailing-list and get PTL approval. After feature freeze, cycle-with-rc
deliverables need to produce a first release candidate (and a stable
branch) before RC1 deadline ($rc1-deadline)
* Deliverables following cycle-with-intermediary model can release as
necessary, but in all cases before Final RC deadline ($final-rc-deadline)
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Non-client library freeze: $nclfreeze (R-6 week)
Client library freeze: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$SERIES-3 milestone: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$other-upcoming-event
Review any remaining milestone-2 exceptions
Now that we are past MembershipFreeze, we should check if the OpenStack map
will need to be updated to reflect future final release contents. If any
changes are needed, those should be proposed in Gerrit as changes to the
openinfra/openstack-map
repository.
Plan the next release cycle schedule based on the number of desired weeks or
by making sure the cycle ends within a few weeks of the next developer
event. Using the Monday of the close of the last cycle, and the
Monday of the planned last week of the new cycle, use the tool
tools/list_weeks.py
to generate the release schedule YAML file.
For example:
./tools/list_weeks.py t 2019-04-15 2019-10-16
The generated output can be used to set up the schedule similar to what was done for the Ussuri release.
Note
Use format-yaml doc/source/$series/schedule.yaml
before pushing
the patch to gerrit to check consistency.
Generate a list of intermediary-released service deliverables that have not done a release in this cycle yet. For this, use:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased \
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type horizon-plugin --type other --type service
Intermediary-released deliverables that did release only once during the last cycle, and have not done a release yet are good candidates to switch to the cycle-with-rc model, which is much more suitable for deliverables that are only released once per cycle.
Note
Not every deliverable meeting the above criteria should be encouraged to change release model. For example if there are very limited changes per cycle, a single release without RCs is probably OK. A team may also want to keep the possibility of releasing multiple times per cycle.
Deliverables possibly meeting the criteria should be reviewed during the release meeting, and a release model change should be proposed for all deliverables where it could make sense. PTLs and release liaisons may decide to:
immediately release an intermediary release (and -1 the proposed change)
confirm the release model change (+1 the proposed change)
stay uncertain for this cycle of how many releases will be made, but acknowledge that they need to do a release before RC1 (-1 the proposed change)
Send the following weekly email content:
General Information
-------------------
The following cycle-with-intermediary deliverables have not done any
intermediary release yet during this cycle. The cycle-with-rc release
model is more suited for deliverables that plan to be released only once
per cycle. As a result, we have proposed[1] to change the release model
for the following deliverables:
[ list of deliverables ]
[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:$series-cwi
PTLs and release liaisons for each of those deliverables can either +1
the release model change, or propose an intermediary release for that
deliverable. In absence of answer by the end of R-10 week we'll consider
that the switch to cycle-with-rc is preferable.
We also published a proposed release schedule for the upcoming
$nextseries cycle. Please check out the separate thread:
[ link to thread ]
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Non-client library freeze: $nclfreeze (R-6 week)
Client library freeze: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$SERIES-3 milestone: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$other-upcoming-event
Make sure the next development series name has been added to the
data/series_status.yaml
file.
Send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
We are entering the last weeks of the $series development cycle. From
now until the final release, we'll send a countdown email like this
every week.
It's probably a good time for teams to take stock of their library and
client work that needs to be completed yet. The non-client library freeze
is coming up, followed closely by the client lib freeze. Please plan
accordingly to avoid any last minute rushes to get key functionality in.
General Information
-------------------
Next week is the Extra-AC freeze, in preparation for elections. All
contributions to OpenStack are valuable, but some are not expressed as
Gerrit code changes. Please list active contributors to your project team
who do not have a code contribution this cycle, and therefore won't
automatically be considered an Active Contributor and allowed
to vote. This is done by adding extra-acs to
https://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/projects.yaml
before the Extra-AC freeze on $extraac.
A quick reminder of the upcoming freeze dates. Those vary depending on
deliverable type:
* Oslo libraries are entering feature freeze next week, $extraac.
* General libraries (except client libraries) need to have their last
feature release before Non-client library freeze ($nclfreeze). Their
stable branches are cut early.
* Client libraries (think python-*client libraries) need to have their
last feature release before Client library freeze ($milestone3)
* Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most
services) observe a Feature freeze on that same date, $milestone3. Any
feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the mailing-list
and get PTL approval. After feature freeze, cycle-with-rc deliverables
need to produce a first release candidate (and a stable branch) before
RC1 deadline ($rc1-deadline)
* Deliverables following cycle-with-intermediary model can release as
necessary, but in all cases before Final RC deadline ($final-rc-deadline)
Finally, now is also a good time to start planning what highlights you
want for your deliverables in the cycle highlights. The deadline to
submit an initial version for those is set to one week after Feature
freeze ($highlights).
Background on cycle-highlights:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125613.html
Project Team Guide, Cycle-Highlights:
https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle-highlights
jeremy [at] openstack.org/fungi on IRC is available if you need
help selecting or writing your highlights.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Extra-AC freeze: $extraac (R-7 week)
Oslo feature freeze: $extraac (R-7 week)
Non-client library freeze: $nclfreeze (R-6 week)
Client library freeze: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$SERIES-3 milestone: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
Cycle highlights deadline: $highlights (R-4 week)
$other-upcoming-event
Notify the Infrastructure team to generate an artifact signing key (but not replace the current one yet), and begin the attestation process.
Check with the Technical Committee to make sure Python runtimes have been determined for the next development cycle and that Zuul job templates have been created to include those runtimes.
The upcoming release deadlines may include the creation of stable branches. When that branching is performed, automated patches will be proposed to the master branch of those repos to switch them over to the next cycle’s job template. If the template is not defined yet, those patches will get a Zuul error. A recheck of failed patches will clear that up once the template is defined, but it is best if any errors can be avoided to make sure the patches get approved in a timely manner.
Send the following weekly email content:
Development Focus
-----------------
Work on libraries should be wrapping up, in preparation for the various
library-related deadlines coming up. Now is a good time to make decisions
on deferring feature work to the next development cycle in order to be
able to focus on finishing already-started feature work.
General Information
-------------------
We are now getting close to the end of the cycle, and will be gradually
freezing feature work on the various deliverables that make up the
OpenStack release.
This coming week is the deadline for general libraries (except client
libraries): their last feature release needs to happen before "Non-client
library freeze" on $nclfreeze. Only bugfixes releases will be allowed
beyond this point.
When requesting those library releases, you can also include the
stable/$series branching request with the review (as an example, see the
"branches" section here:
https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/pike/os-brick.yaml#n2
In the next weeks we will have deadlines for:
* Client libraries (think python-*client libraries), which need to have
their last feature release before "Client library freeze" ($milestone3)
* Deliverables following a cycle-with-rc model (that would be most
services), which observe a Feature freeze on that same date, $milestone3.
Any feature addition beyond that date should be discussed on the
mailing-list and get PTL approval.
As we are getting to the point of creating stable/$series branches, this
would be a good point for teams to review membership in their
$project-stable-maint groups. Once the stable/$series branches are cut
for a repo, the ability to approve any necessary backports into those
branches for $series will be limited to the members of that stable team.
If there are any questions about stable policy or stable team membership,
please reach out in the #openstack-stable channel.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Non-client library freeze: $nclfreeze (R-6 week)
Client library freeze: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
$SERIES-3 milestone: $milestone3 (R-5 week)
Cycle Highlights Due: $highlight (R-4 week)
$series final release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary libraries (excluding client libraries) which had commits that have not been included in a release.
List them using:
./tools/list_library_unreleased_changes.sh > /tmp/cwiff.log
Clean the generated list to keep projects names only.
Generate the patches by using process_auto_releases
:
./tools/process_auto_releases.sh $SERIES $(cat /tmp/cwiff.log)
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-final-non-client-libs
as topic.
That patch will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the library, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
Note
At this point, we want all changes in the deliverables, to ensure that we have CI configuration up to date when the stable branch is created later.
Allow the stable/$series
branch to be requested with each library
final release if they know they are ready. Do not require branching at
this point in case of critical issues requiring another approved release
past the freeze date.
Between Tuesday and Thursday, merge as soon as possible the patches that get +1 from the PTL or the release liaison.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content preparing for R-5 week:
Development Focus
-----------------
We are getting close to the end of the $series cycle! Next week on
$milestone3 is the $series-3 milestone, also known as feature freeze.
It's time to wrap up feature work in the services and their client
libraries, and defer features that won't make it to the $next-series cycle.
General Information
-------------------
This coming week is the deadline for client libraries: their last feature
release needs to happen before "Client library freeze" on $milestone3.
Only bugfix releases will be allowed beyond this point.
When requesting those library releases, you can also include the
stable/$series branching request with the review. As an example, see the
"branches" section here:
https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/pike/os-brick.yaml#n2
$milestone3 is also the deadline for feature work in all OpenStack
deliverables following the cycle-with-rc model. To help those projects
produce a first release candidate in time, only bugfixes should be allowed
in the master branch beyond this point. Any feature work past that deadline
has to be raised as a Feature Freeze Exception (FFE) and approved by the
team PTL.
Finally, feature freeze is also a good time for submitting a first version
of your cycle-highlights. Cycle highlights are the raw data that helps shape
what is communicated in press releases and other release activity at the
end of the cycle, avoiding direct contacts from marketing folks. See
https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/release-management.html#cycle-highlights
for more details.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
$series-3 milestone (feature freeze): $milestone3 (R-5 week)
RC1 deadline: $rc1-deadline (R-3 week)
Final RC deadline: $final-rc-deadline (R-1 week)
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Process any remaining library freeze exception.
Propose autoreleases (process_auto_releases
) for
cycle-with-intermediary
client libraries which had commits that have
not been included in a release.
List them using:
./tools/list_client_library_unreleased_changes.sh
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-milestone-3
as topic.
That patch will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the library, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
Allow the stable/$series
branch to be requested with each client
library final release if they know they are ready. Do not require
branching at this point in case of critical issues requiring another
approved release past the freeze date.
Between Tuesday and Thursday, merge as soon as possible the patches that get +1 from the PTL or the release liaison.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
Evaluate any non-client libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle to see if it is time to transition them to the independent release model.
Note: client libraries (and other libraries strongly tied to another deliverable) should generally follow their parent deliverable release model, even if they did not have a lot of activity themselves).
If it is OK to transition them, propose to move the deliverable file to
the _independent
directory.
If it is not OK to transition them, propose a new minor release and stable branch from HEAD.
A full list of unreleased libraries
and client-libraries
for the cycle
can be found with:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased --type library --type client-library
List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased \
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type horizon-plugin --type other --type service
Send a separate email targeted to teams with such unreleased deliverables saying:
Quick reminder that we'll need a release very soon for a number of
deliverables following a cycle-with-intermediary release model but which
have not done *any* release yet in the $series cycle:
{{list-of-deliverables}}
Those should be released ASAP, and in all cases before $rc1-deadline, so
that we have a release to include in the final $series release.
On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to
openstack/requirements
by applying -2 to all
open patches. Ensure that reviewers do not approve changes created
by the proposal bot, but do approve changes for new OpenStack deliverable
releases.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content for R-4 week.
Note: String freezes are applied to I18n team target projects
and with cycle-with-rc
or cycle-with-intermediary
release model:
Development Focus
-----------------
We just passed feature freeze! Until release branches are cut, you
should stop accepting featureful changes to deliverables following the
cycle-with-rc release model, or to libraries. Exceptions should be
discussed on separate threads on the mailing-list, and feature freeze
exceptions approved by the team's PTL.
Focus should be on finding and fixing release-critical bugs, so that
release candidates and final versions of the $series deliverables can be
proposed, well ahead of the final $series release date.
General Information
-------------------
We are still finishing up processing a few release requests, but the
$series release requirements are now frozen. If new library releases are
needed to fix release-critical bugs in $series, you must request a
Requirements Freeze Exception (RFE) from the requirements team before we
can do a new release to avoid having something released in $series that
is not actually usable. This is done by posting to the openstack-discuss
mailing list with a subject line similar to:
[$PROJECT][requirements] RFE requested for $PROJECT_LIB
Include justification/reasoning for why a RFE is needed for this lib.
If/when the requirements team OKs the post-freeze update, we can then
process a new release.
A soft String freeze is now in effect, in order to let the I18N team do the
translation work in good conditions. In Horizon and the various dashboard
plugins, you should stop accepting changes that modify user-visible
strings. Exceptions should be discussed on the mailing-list. By
$rc-final-date this will become a hard string freeze, with no changes
in user-visible strings allowed.
Actions
-------
stable/$series branches should be created soon for all not-already-branched
libraries. You should expect 2-3 changes to be proposed for each: a
.gitreview update, a reno update (skipped for projects not using reno),
and a tox.ini constraints URL update. Please review those in priority
so that the branch can be functional ASAP.
The Prelude section of reno release notes is rendered as the top level
overview for the release. Any important overall messaging for $series
changes should be added there to make sure the consumers of your release
notes see them.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
RC1 deadline: $rc1-deadline (R-3 week)
Final RC deadline: $final-rc-deadline (R-1 week)
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Process any remaining client library freeze exception.
Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week so that they can be included in release marketing preparations.
Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period.
Note
Do not release libraries without a link to a message to openstack-discuss requesting a requirements RFE and an approval response from that team.
Propose stable/$series
branch creation for all client and non-client
libraries that had not requested it at freeze time.
The following command may be used:
tox -e venv -- propose-library-branches --include-clients
Warning
Please use $series-stable-branches
as gerrit topic.
That patch will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the library, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months. For this, use the following command, with YYYY-MM-DD being the day two months ago:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased-since YYYY-MM-DD
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type horizon-plugin --type other --type service
Send a separate email targeted to teams with such old deliverables saying:
Quick reminder that for deliverables following the cycle-with-intermediary
model, the release team will use the latest $series release available on
release week.
The following deliverables have done a $series release, but it was not
refreshed in the last two months:
{{list_of_deliverables}}
You should consider making a new one very soon, so that we don't use an
outdated version for the final release.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content preparing for R-3 week:
Development Focus
-----------------
The Release Candidate (RC) deadline is next Thursday, $rc1-deadline. Work
should be focused on fixing any release-critical bugs.
General Information
-------------------
All deliverables released under a cycle-with-rc model should have a first
release candidate by the end of the week, from which a stable/$series
branch will be cut. This branch will track the $series release.
Once stable/$series has been created, the master branch will be ready to
switch to $next-series development. While the master branch will no longer
be feature-frozen, please prioritize any work necessary for completing
$series plans. Release-critical bugfixes will need to be merged in the
master branch first, then backported to the stable/$series branch before
a new release candidate can be proposed.
Actions
-------
Early in the week, the release team will be proposing RC1 patches for all
cycle-with-rc projects, using the latest commit from the master branch.
If your team is ready to go for cutting RC1, please let us know by
leaving a +1 on these patches.
If there are still a few more patches needed before RC1, you can -1 the
patch and update it later in the week with the new commit hash you would
like to use. Remember, stable/$series branches will be created with this,
so you will want to make sure you have what you need included to avoid
needing to backport changes from the master branch (which will
technically then be $next-series) to this stable branch for any
additional RCs before the final release.
The release team will also be proposing releases for any deliverable
following a cycle-with-intermediary model that has not produced any $series
release so far.
Finally, now is a good time to finalize release highlights. Release
highlights help shape the messaging around the release and make sure that
your work is properly represented.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
RC1 deadline: $rc1-deadline (R-3 week)
Final RC deadline: $final-rc-deadline (R-1 week)
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Process any remaining library branching exception.
On the Monday, generate release requests for all deliverables that have do not have a suitable candidate yet. That includes:
Branch devstack-plugin-*
delivrables. Usually devstack plugings are
branchless and tagless so out of our jurisdiction, however, some are just
tagless so they are deliverables that must be branched. Please use the
gerrit topic devstack-plugin-$series
to help to track them. Example
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/785180
cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not released yet, for which a release should be proposed from HEAD. Stable branch creation should be included, unless the deliverable has specified the ‘stable-branch-type: none’ option. You can list those using:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased \
--model cycle-with-intermediary \
--type horizon-plugin --type other --type service
Note
The command lists some deliverables that clearly don’t need a release
(like requirements, release-tests). If there are multiple deliverables
that require a release, then feel free to use process_auto_releases
to generate the patches. Please use $series-cwi-not-released
as
topic.
cycle-with-rc that are not trailing deliverables and that have not done a RC1 yet, for which a release should be proposed from HEAD, and include stable branch creation. You can list those using:
tools/list_rc1.sh
Generate patches by using process_auto_releases
.
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-rc1-deadline
as topic.
Those patches will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait for a specific patch to make it to the release, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch with a different commit SHA.
Between Tuesday and Thursday, merge as soon as possible the patches that get +1 from the PTL or the release liaison.
By EOD Thursday, ideally we would want a +1 from the PTL and/or release liaison to indicate approval. However we will consider the absence of -1 or otherwise negative feedback as an indicator that the automatically proposed patches can be approved.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content preparing for R-2 week:
Development Focus
-----------------
At this point we should have release candidates (RC1 or recent intermediary
release) for all the $series deliverables. Teams should be working on any
release-critical bugs that would require another RC or intermediary release
before the final release.
Actions
-------
Early in the week, the release team will be proposing stable/$series branch
creation for all deliverables that have not branched yet, using the latest
available $series release as the branch point. If your team is ready to go
for creating that branch, please let us know by leaving a +1 on these
patches.
If you would like to wait for another release before branching, you can -1
the patch and update it later in the week with the new release you would
like to use. By the end of the week the release team will merge those
patches though, unless an exception is granted.
Once stable/$series branches are created, if a release-critical bug is
detected, you will need to fix the issue in the master branch first, then
backport the fix to the stable/$series branch before releasing out of the
stable/$series branch.
After all of the cycle-with-rc projects have branched we will branch
devstack, grenade, and the requirements repos. This will effectively open
them up for $next-series development, though the focus should still be on
finishing up $series until the final release.
Opening up the new development cycle is also a good opportunity to teams
to revise their zuul jobs and used nodesets and clean up all unnecessary
ones.
For projects with translations, watch for any translation patches coming
through and merge them quickly. A new release should be produced so that
translations are included in the final $series release.
Finally, now is a good time to finalize release notes. In particular,
consider adding any relevant "prelude" content. Release notes are
targetted for the downstream consumers of your project, so it would be
great to include any useful information for those that are going to pick
up and use or deploy the $series version of your project.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Final RC deadline: $final-rc-deadline (R-1 week)
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Process any standing RC1 deadline exceptions.
Gracefully release tempest plugins with latest changes available. Tempest
plugins are branchless however they should be released on their HEAD
at
the end of each cycle at least
(cf. the legacy cycle automatic model and
the tempest-plugin type).
You can preview unreleased changes by using:
$ tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --type tempest-plugin
$ tools/list_unreleased_changes.sh wallaby <tempest-plugin-projects>
Process auto release for those who need to be released:
$ tools/process_auto_releases.sh $series <tempest-plugin-projects-list>
Warning
Please use $series-tp-latest
as gerrit topic.
On the Monday, generate stable branches for all cycle deliverables that are still missing one.
You can list those using:
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --no-stable-branch --cycle-based-no-trailing
Warning
Please use $series-missing-stable-branches
as gerrit topic.
Those patches will be used as a base to communicate with the team: if a team wants to wait and make another release before the branch is cut, someone from the team can -1 the patch to have it held, or update that patch to include another release and stable branch point.
Between Tuesday and Thursday, merge as soon as possible the patches that get +1 from the PTL or the release liaison.
On the Friday, merge patches that did not get any feedback from PTL or release liaison. Discuss standing -1s to see if they should be granted an exception and wait until next week.
After all the projects enabled in devstack by default have been branched, we can engage with the QA, I18n and Requirements PTLs to finalize the stable branch setup:
Note
Information about PTLs could be easily retrieved either from the governance project or from the release project.
At this point all projects should have their branches created,
as doing the branching first is a prerequisite to allow us to branch
requirements. You can ensure that all projects are branched by using
tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --no-stable-branch
--cycle-based-no-trailing
where a non empty list mean that some
projects are missing a stable branch and a patch should be proposed to
create it. The requirements team expect an empty output of this
command, so you should not continue to the next point until its output
is empty.
Note
The previous command will return the requirements deliverable however in this case this one can be ignored, because our goal is to branch it.
If the previous list is empty then remind the QA PTL to manage their release duties (cf. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/releases).
Note
More examples about the QA team’s patches during the ussuri cycle are available here https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:qa-ussuri-release
Note
As soon as grenade is updated for the new branch (see the RC1 instructions that follow), projects without stable branches may start seeing issues with their grenade jobs because without the stable branch the branch selection will cause the jobs to run master->master instead of previous->master. At the end of Ocata this caused trouble for the Ironic team, for example.
Remind the I18n SIG lead to update the translation tools for the new stable series.
If the previous list is empty then we can remind the requirements
PTL to propose an update to the deliverable file to create
the stable/$series
branch for openstack/requirements
and then
remind to him to announce that the requirements freeze is lifted
from master.
Note
We wait until after the other projects have branched to create the branch for requirements because tests for the stable branches of those projects will fall back to using the master branch of requirements until the same stable branch is created, but if the branch for the requirements repo exists early the changes happening in master on the other projects will not use it and we can have divergence between the requirements being tested and being declared as correct.
Ensure that all projects that are publishing release notes have the notes link included in their deliverable file. This is done by running the command:
tools/add_release_note_links.sh $series
Then submit the updated deliverable files in one patch to update the docs.
Example given: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723540/
Let cycle-with-rc projects iterate on RCs as needed. The final release candidate for each project needs to be prepared at least one week before the final release date.
Note
Try to avoid creating more than 3 release candidates so we are not creating candidates that consumers are then trained to ignore. Each release candidate should be kept for at least 1 day, so if there is a proposal to create RCx but clearly a reason to create another one, delay RCX to include the additional patches. Teams that know they will need additional release candidates can submit the requests and mark them WIP until actually ready, so the release team knows that more candidates are coming.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content preparing for R-1 week:
Development Focus
-----------------
We are on the final mile of the $series development cycle!
Remember that the $series final release will include the latest release
candidate (for cycle-with-rc deliverables) or the latest intermediary
release (for cycle-with-intermediary deliverables) available.
$final-rc-deadline is the deadline for final $series release candidates
as well as any last cycle-with-intermediary deliverables. We will then
enter a quiet period until we tag the final release on $release-date.
Teams should be prioritizing fixing release-critical bugs, before that
deadline.
Otherwise it's time to start planning the $next-series development cycle,
including discussing Forum and PTG sessions content, in preparation of
$other-upcoming-event.
Actions
-------
Watch for any translation patches coming through on the stable/$series
branch and merge them quickly. If you discover a release-critical issue,
please make sure to fix it on the master branch first, then backport the
bugfix to the stable/$series branch before triggering a new release.
Please drop by #openstack-release with any questions or concerns about
the upcoming release !
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
Process any remaining stable branching exception.
Notify the documentation (Technical Writing SIG - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation) team that it should be safe to apply their process to create the new release series landing pages for docs.openstack.org. Their process works better if they wait until most of the projects have their stable branches created, but they can do the work before the final release date to avoid having to synchronize with the release team on that day.
On the day before the deadline for final release candidates, propose last-minute RCs where needed:
Check the list of unreleased changes for cycle-with-rc projects, by running the following command in the releases repo working directory:
$ ./tools/list_rc_updates.sh
Propose patches creating a new RC for those that have unreleased
bugfixes or updated translations. Generate patches by using
process_auto_releases
.
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-final-rc
as topic.
Patches that get a +1 from PTL or release liaison should be approved. A -1 will mean that the PTL prefers to wait for a post-release stable update. Patches that get no feedback by the deadline should be abandoned.
At the end of the week, send weekly email content preparing for R-0 week:
Development Focus
-----------------
We will be releasing the coordinated OpenStack $series release next week,
on $release-date. Thanks to everyone involved in the $series cycle!
We are now in pre-release freeze, so no new deliverable will be created
until final release, unless a release-critical regression is spotted.
Otherwise, teams attending the PTG in $ptg-location should start to plan
what they will be discussing there, by creating and filling team etherpads.
You can access the list of PTG etherpads at:
http://ptg.openstack.org/etherpads.html
General Information
-------------------
On release day, the release team will produce final versions of
deliverables following the cycle-with-rc release model, by re-tagging
the commit used for the last RC.
A patch doing just that will be proposed. PTLs and release liaisons should
watch for that final release patch from the release team. While not
required, we would appreciate having an ack from each team before we
approve it on the 16th, so that their approval is included in the metadata
that goes onto the signed tag.
Upcoming Deadlines & Dates
--------------------------
Final $SERIES release: $release-date
$other-upcoming-event
After the email is sent, use propose-final-releases
to tag the
existing most recent release candidates as the final release for
projects using the cycle-with-rc model.
We are in pre-release freeze. Only release-critical regressions, or legal compliance issues, or bugs making it otherwise impossible to install and use the software on release day, should be considered by the release management team for a pre-release freeze exception. If approved, release freeze exceptions should trigger the production of a new RC (or cycle-with-intermediary release) and (if needed) a regeneration of the final release patch.
On release day freeze all other release activity by holding stable branch releases while coordinated release is underway.
Few hours before approving the release patch ensure that all the available release note landing pages are present (example: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786374):
tools/add_release_note_links.sh $SERIES
On release day, approve the final release patch created earlier. Before merging the patch ensure that used infras are operational, you can do that by looking at https://status.python.org/ and by asking to our infra team how is the situation of the openstack infra.
Note
This needs to happen several hours before the press release from the foundation (to give us time to handle failures) but not too far in advance (to avoid releasing the day before the press release).
Once the final patch is proceesed, run the missing-releases
script
to check for missing tarballs on the release page before the announcement:
tox -e venv -- missing-releases --series $SERIES
If there are any missing deliverables, fix them.
Warning
process_auto_releases
will ask you to enter a topic for the patches.
Please use $series-final-missing-deliverables
as topic.
Mark series as released on releases.o.o, by updating
doc/source/$series/index.rst
, data\series_status.yaml
, and
changing the default series in openstack_releases/default.py
..
See https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727746 for an example.
Note
This item can be staged as a patch on top of the final release patch.
The next-phase
date should be set to the first Monday after the
period declared for the Maintained phase.
See https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#maintenance-phases
Send release announcement email to
openstack-announce@lists.openstack.org
, based on
templates/final.txt
. Coordinate the timing of the email with
the press release from the Foundation staff.
Send an email to the openstack-discuss list to point to the official
release announcement from the previous step, and declare
openstack/releases
unfrozen for releases on the new series.
Except where otherwise noted, this document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See all OpenStack Legal Documents.